Sunday, April 26, 2015

More water than blood: A cross Atlantic Context

We are privileged, here at The Razor, to be given the opportunity to share articles that were written by Martin French (of the Louisville Coopers and the Louisville/Derby City Boarding Crew); that were published in the Waterford United matchday program. Without further ado...

The top of the US football system, similar to here, is on the third game of the season this weekend, with the two other professional leagues starting soon. However, there are elements that feel very different to Ireland’s game, even in terms of basic structure. As I am going to be following it a lot closer this year, I am going to explore some of the differences occasionally here
In Major League Soccer (MLS) in the USA (where I live these days), we are also into the third round of the season, while the second and third tiers are yet to start play, with the second and third tiers yet to kick off. The system here is confusing to those of us brought up in the European sphere, with footballing merit having little influence on promotion up the ladder, and no relegation. Simply put, these leagues are really three independent companies, with differing rules (though all FIFA recognised), who have vied for the right to be considered the top and second levels of football here.
MLS is going since 1996 – it was a part of the deal to get a World Cup here. The league is now 20 strong, with two new teams coming in this season (and one ”resting” for a couple of seasons to rebrand). It’s loosely divided into a Western and an Eastern Conference, with clubs also playing some games with teams in the other conference. At the end of the regular (league) season, 12 of the 20 teams go into conference playoffs, with winners of each conference playing each other in a final known as MLS Cup. It has teams in most of the big TV markets in the country (which is, though unwritten, the chief consideration for “expansion” teams wanting to join the league.
The second tier is the North American Soccer League, better known as the NASL. This isn’t the same NASL of Johnny Giles, Best, Pele and Beckenbauer – it is a separate company that bought out the name. However, as of two years ago, the New York Cosmos started playing in it (again, a new company, but who bought the name, and got Pele to front it). There are only 11 teams in the new NASL, and it follows the Latin American fashion of having an opening and a closing season, with the winners of each meeting in the woefully named “Soccer Bowl”.
The third and final tier of professional football is owned by United Soccer Leagues (who also operate the biggest 4th tier amateur league), and has recently been rebranded as USL. It has expanded from 14 teams last year to 24 this year. USL works somewhat closely if rather informally with MLS and has 8 teams that are essentially reserve sides for MLS clubs, and of the other 16, 12 have a formal affiliation with an MLS team. This years is the first time with conference play, and 2 inter league games for a few teams. As with MLS, the top six finishers in each conference go to playoffs, with the winners of each conference playing for the Championship.
It is in USL that the newly formed Louisville City FC – the professional team for the city I now live in – will make their bow next weekend, at Slugger Field, the local baseball stadium. Affiliated to Orlando City in MLS, and owned by one of their former part owners, the team was somewhat enticed into existence by the demands of a local football supporters’ group, set up for this very purpose.

The manager (called Head Coach here) is a little familiar to Irish eyes: James O’Connor is a former Irish U21 international, and played for a variety teams in the English Championship. He moved to Orlando in 2012 to play for them, becoming a coach and then trading off to get into managing. Further weirdness here is that he is called Coach O’Connor – I wonder what Tommy Griffin would say if we called him Coach Griffin.

Friday, January 30, 2015

It Was as if I Had Waited All This Time For This Moment and For the First Light of This Dawn to be Vindicated...

Sunday was the 20th anniversary of one of the seminal moments in Eric Cantona’s career. One that had a profound effect on Man United. As well as on Cantona’s reputation. Sunday was the anniversary of the kung-fu kick heard ‘round England. Sunday was the 20th anniversary of Eric Cantona’s kick on Matthew Simmons, at Selhurst Park.

In reading the retrospectives that Old Mother Beeb and the Grauniad offered, a few interesting things showed up to me. First, one of the very important points that everyone makes about Cantona, is that he was a man who wanted to do what he wanted to do. He didn’t always feel like it was important to remain within the confines that surrounded him. Throughout his career he was known as L’enfant terrible due to his issues with discipline. But it speaks to something deeper, to look at Cantona within his own context.

As a philosophy student, I found myself in love with Existentialism. I found in Albert Camus a kindred spirit. Someone who saw a lot of the same things about society and life, that I was seeing. He just happened to articulate them, in a manner that was accessible to me, in my mid-20s. Camus’ most famous work is a book called The Stranger. It’s main character Meursault finds himself in much the same type of existence as Eric Cantona. In the book, Meursault is arrested and sentenced to death for committing murder. When asked, repeatedly as to his motivation for doing so, yet he could rarely explain why he committed the murder. Momentary impulse. In the book, Meursault is raging at being blinded by the sunlight reflecting off the beach, and fighting heatstroke. That’s the best guess you can get as for Meursault’s motivations. With this as the basis, the argument could be made that Eric Cantona’s professional football career was similar to that of Meursault’s life, in The Stranger.

Eric Cantona had a way about him. He was the type of footballer whom you either loved zealously. Or you loathed equally as zealously. He was incendiary. He was arrogant. He was mercurial. He was magnificent. He was not man. He was Cantona. He was unlike anything that England had seen before. And truthfully, as I started diving into football played before I came into it, he was unlike anything I’d ever encountered before. He was genuinely his own player. And that made him revolutionary to me.

Football in England, in the early 90s was an exercise in the absurd. The Football League and FA were still recovering from the Taylor Report, and its recommendation of moving from terraces at the football grounds, to all-seaters. England was in the process of transitioning back into European competition after a lengthy ban due to Heysel. On top of all of this madness, SKY felt that the early-90s were a great time to invent football by ushering the Premier League era. In a lot of ways, it was a time when English football was looking for heroes, to help pull them from the doldrums of the late 80s. It needed someone to come along to reinvigorate and energize the game from its slumber. It came, in a manner of speaking, and proved to be more than they could handle.

Eric Cantona was the everything that the Premier League needed at its inception. He embodied a lot of what the Premier League, still, believes football should be about. It was the time of players like Matthew Le Tissier, Alan Shearer, Tony Adams, John Barnes, Teddy Sheringham, Andy Cole, and Peter Schmeichel. It was a time of players who were larger than life. But none of these guys could capture the imagination in much the same way that Cantona did. He began his career, in England, at Leeds. He was a part of the Leeds squad who won the old Football League championship in ’92. The story of how he got transferred to Man United is the story of legend, and has been told to death. So I won’t share it here, except to highlight that part of the reason why Man United got him, was because he was considered to be a bit of a troublemaker to Howard Wilkinson.

Cantona as a player was as enigmatic as you may have ever seen. But he was also very much mercurial. Allegations of how he wouldn’t show up for big matches, but would steal the show in matches that didn’t matter are rife on the internet. His detractors are adamant that he was a blight upon football, and that he should have been banned for life, for his actions at Selhurst Park, 20 years ago Sunday. Yet, for all of those who want to see his legend and legacy torn down; Cantona has an almost Christ-like following. Those who preach of his legend revere him as King Eric. The same one who scored the beautiful chipped goal against Sunderland, was also capable of terrible temper tantrums. The complexity of his character, and the complexity of the man beneath the Cantona exterior is unfathomably intense.

With this in mind, let’s reference the events of that night at Selhurst. He was feeling aggrieved at the referee for not punishing Richard Shaw. He took umbrage upon the continual kicking he was receiving from Richard Shaw. When the referee finally bothered to brandish a card, it was a straight red to Cantona for a well-placed retaliatory kick on Shaw. Cantona had a knack about him for drawing attention, especially negative. And this was no exception. So, he was given his marching orders. Converging events. Meursault, in his own similar way, got caught in a build up of events. From his Maman’s passing, to his relationship with Marie, to the plot with Raymond to catch Raymond’s girlfriend cheating and to beat her. Eventually, much like Meursault and the Arab, because of his aggravation at the brightness of the sun on the beach; Cantona hit his breaking point after being disparaged, and kung-fu kicked Matthew Simmons into history.

Cantona, as a player, was adamantly determined to do things by his own rules. He never really felt remorse for his decisions. He just acknowledged them, and moved on. Much in the same way that Meursault never truly felt remorse for killing the Arab. Meursault’s tenuous relationship with the chaplain, especially in how the chaplain is threatened by Meursault’s stubbornness about seeking forgiveness; it’s Cantona and the FA, or the media. Meursault would rebuff the chaplain without bothering to hear him out. And Cantona famously had the apology to the prostitute had supposedly spent the night with, as well as his infamous quote about seagulls and trawlers. Their flippancy is indicative of their disdain for the society who cannot understand that you don’t necessarily need a justifiable cause to do something. Without delving into the philosophical paradox that arises from the projection of one’s morality onto another, that’s really the point. Meursault and Cantona existed in their own worlds. They did what they wanted. They did not worry about what consequence it may bring. They accepted their consequence, albeit begrudgingly, and moved on. In Cantona’s case, it was a 9 month ban, and for Meursault, it was execution. It was a drastic response and consequence for a choice made, in the heat of the moment, by a man whose perception of the world, and his role in it; something that convention and society cannot understand. Therein lies the absurdity. To Cantona and Meursault, the reactions of society at their actions makes no sense. To them, it is a blowing out of proportion, the events that took place around them. In this sense, the context of man fighting against an absurd tempest surrounding him, becomes clearer. They were just men who wanted to live their own lives. And it wasn’t until they were worn down by the system they raged against, that they ultimately relented.

Eric Cantona, to me, was very much the fish out of water story. While he excelled in facets of English football, he wasn’t for the game. It wasn’t a good fit for him. While he may not have killed an Arab, he did randomly kick and punch a Crystal Palace supporter. He also opened a can of worms of animosity between his former club and Palace, that ultimately got a Palace supporter killed. Maybe the parallels run deeper than I thought.


I suspect that Meursault, had he been a footballer, would have been of a similar mettle. His indifference to straying from his own path would have brandished him as a troublemaker. And maybe a scintillating goal or two for the ages. He would, had he been born of this world, been Eric Cantona. Enigmatic. Mercurial. And most importantly, controversial. And he’d have everyone’s attention, whether they loved him or not.